Trends and Gaps in Empirical Research on Open Educational Resources (OER): A Systematic Mapping of the Literature from 2015 to 2019

Daniel Otto; Nadine Schroeder; Daniel Diekmann; Pia Sander

doi:10.30935/cedtech/11145

Daniel Otto ¹ ^* , Nadine Schroeder ¹, Daniel Diekmann ¹, Pia Sander ¹

More Detail

CONT ED TECHNOLOGY, Volume 13, Issue 4, Article No: ep325

https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11145

Submitted: 23 April 2021, Published Online: 14 August 2021

OPEN ACCESS 3489 Views 1516 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

For almost 20 years, Open Educational Resources (OER) are an integral part of the debate about the digitisation of education. However, the empirical landscape of OER research is vivid and largely obscure. This article reviews the state of international empirical research on OER to reveal trends and gaps and, in this manner, identify possible desiderata for further research. We use a systematic mapping approach to examine the empirical English-speaking research landscape from 2015 to 2019. The results reveal that research primarily concentrates on the higher education sector while only a few studies are available for the school and other educational sectors. In terms of research methodologies, quantitative approaches are prevalent, with most of them being survey-based. The main research interests of the empirical studies lie in the perception of OER and the barriers to their use in educational practices. Open textbooks as a form of OER and their comparative cost advantages or qualitative comparability with traditional educational material constitute an emerging research field that is almost exclusively located in the U.S. Research gaps exist regarding the usability and user-friendliness of OER repositories. Addressing these gaps could support the numerous initiatives in different countries to establish and equip repositories. Additional gaps for empirical research were identified regarding the effects of the use of OER on pedagogical approaches and established educational practices.

Keywords: Open Educational Resources, OER, systematic mapping, empirical research, review

References

Baas, M., Admiraal, W., & van den Berg, E. (2019). Teachers’ adoption of open educational resources in higher education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2019(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.510
Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology in higher education: A systematic review in the field of arts and humanities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 126-150. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5477
Belikov, O. M., & Bodily, R. (2016). Incentives and barriers to OER adoption: A qualitative analysis of faculty perceptions. Open Praxis, 8(3), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.308
BMBF. (2020). Karliczek: Bund unterstützt in Krise mit digitaler Lerninfrastruktur – BMBF [Karliczek: Federal government supports in crisis with digital learning infrastructure - BMBF]. In Pressemitteilugen (pp. 3). Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. https://www.presseportal.de/pm/67245/4558454
Bozkurt, A., Koseoglu, S., & Singh, L. (2019). An analysis of peer reviewed publications on openness in education in half a century: Trends and patterns in the open hemisphere. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 68-97. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4252
Braddlee, & Vanscoy, A. (2019). Bridging the chasm: Faculty support roles for academic librarians in the adoption of open educational resources. College and Research Libraries, 80(4), 426-449. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.4.426
Clements, K., Pawlowski, J., & Manouselis, N. (2015). Open educational resources repositories literature review - Towards a comprehensive quality approaches framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1098-1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.026
Clinton, V. (2019). Cost, outcomes, use, and perceptions of open educational resources in psychology: A narrative review of the literature. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 18(1), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725718799511
Cronin, C., & MacLaren, I. (2018). Conceptualising OEP: A review of theoretical and empirical literature in Open Educational Practices. Open Praxis, 10(2), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.2.825
Cuttler, C. (2019). Students’ use and perceptions of the relevance and quality of open textbooks compared to traditional textbooks in online and traditional classroom environments. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 18(1), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725718811300
Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Educational Technology and Society, 18(3), 75-88. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.3.75
Fernandez, A., Insfran, E., & Abrahão, S. (2011). Usability evaluation methods for the web: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 53(8), 789-817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2011.02.007
Green, A. G. (2017). What is Open Pedagogy? Year of Open. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27026.86726
Hassan, Q. K., Rahaman, K. R., Sumon, K. Z., & Dewan, A. (2019). Lessons learned from the development of open educational resources at post-secondary level in the field of environmental modelling: An exploratory study. Education Sciences, 9(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020103
Henderson, S., & Ostashewski, N. (2018). Barriers, incentives, and benefits of the open educational resources (OER) movement: An exploration into instructor perspectives. First Monday, 23(12). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i12.9172
Hew, K. F., Lan, M., Tang, Y., Jia, C., & Lo, C. K. (2019). Where is the “theory” within the field of educational technology research? British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 956-971. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12770
Hilton, J. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: a review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 573-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9
Hilton, J. (2019). Open educational resources, student efficacy, and user perceptions: a synthesis of research published between 2015 and 2018. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 853-876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09700-4
Hodgkinson-Williams, C., & Trotter, H. (2018). A Social Justice Framework for Understanding Open Educational Resources and Practices in the Global South. Journal of Learning for Development - JL4D, 5(3), 204-224. https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/312
Illowsky, B. S., Hilton III, J., Whiting, J., & Ackerman, J. D. (2016). Examining student perception of an open statistics book. Open Praxis, 8(3), 265-276. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.304
Kerres, M., & Heinen, R. (2015). Open informational ecosystems: The missing link for sharing educational resources. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(1), 24-39. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.2008
King, M., Pegrum, M., & Forsey, M. (2018). MOOCs and OER in the Global South: Problems and potential. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i5.3742
Koseoglu, S., & Bozkurt, A. (2018). An exploratory literature review on open educational practices. Distance Education, 39(4), 441-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520042
Lambert, S. R. (2018). Changing our (dis)course: A distinctive social justice aligned definition of open education. Journal of Learning for Development - JL4D, 5(3), 225-244. https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/290
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Marín, V. I., Orellana, M. L., & Peré, N. (2019). Open educational resources for research training: Quality assurance through a collaborative evaluation. Research in Learning Technology, 27. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v27.2271
Masterman, E. (2016). Bringing open educational practice to a research-intensive university: Prospects and challenges. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(1), 31-42.
Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), 10. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089
Mishra, S. (2017). Open educational resources: removing barriers from within. Distance Education, 38(3), 369-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1369350
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
Moundridou, M., Zalavra, E., Papanikolaou, K., & Tripiniotis, A. (2019). Collaboratively developing open educational resources for engineering educators in Slidewiki. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 9(2), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v9i2.9959
Newman, M., & Gough, D. (2020). Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application. In Systematic Reviews in Educational Research (pp. 3-22). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7_1
Orr, D., Neumann, J., & Muuß-Merholz, J. (2017). German OER Practices and Policy — from Bottom-up to Top-down Initiatives.
Otto, D. (2019). Adoption and diffusion of open educational resources (OER) in education: A meta-analysis of 25 OER-projects. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 20(5), 122-140. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4472
Otto, D. (2021). Driven by emotions! The effect of attitudes on intention and behaviour regarding Open Educational Resources (OER). Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2021(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.606
Otto, D., & Kerres, M. (In Press). Deconstructing the virtues of openness and its contribution to Bildung in the digital age. In D. Kergel, J. Garsdahl, M. Paulsen, & B. Heidkamp-Kergel (Hrsg.), Bildung in the Digital Age. Routledge.
Ozdemir, O., & Bonk, C. (2017). Turkish teachers’ awareness and perceptions of Open Educational Resources. Journal of Learning for Development, 4(3), 307-321.
Peters, M. A. (2014). Openness and the Intellectual Commons. Open Review of Educational Research, 1(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2014.984975
Peters, M. A., & Peter Roberts. (2011). Introduction The Virtues of Openness. In Virtues of Openness | Education, Science, and Scholarship in the Digital Age (pp. 1-16). Routledge.
Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson, M. (2008). Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE 2008. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/ease2008.8
Ramirez-Montoya, M. S. (2020). Challenges for open education with educational innovation: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(17), 7053. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177053
Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., Abdullah, N. A., Zakari, A., & Haruna, K. (2019). A Systematic Mapping Study of the Empirical MOOC Literature. IEEE Access, 7, 124809-124827. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2938561
Sandanayake, T. C. (2019). Promoting open educational resources-based blended learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0133-6
Santos-Hermosa, G., Ferran-Ferrer, N., & Abadal, E. (2017). Repositories of open educational resources: An assessment of reuse and educational aspects. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18(5), 84-120. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3063
Schuwer, R., & Janssen, B. (2018). Adoption of sharing and reuse of open resources by educators in higher education institutions in the Netherlands: A qualitative research of practices, motives, and conditions. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19(3), 1151-1171. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3390
Ting, K. M. (2010). Precision and Recall BT - Encyclopedia of Machine Learning (C. Sammut & G. I. Webb (Hrsg.); S. 781). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_652
UNESCO. (2002). Forum on the impact of open courseware for higher education in developing countries final report UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2019). Draft Recommendation on Open Educational Resources. UNESCO. General Conference, 40th, 2019; UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000370936
UNESCO IITE. (2019). Understanding the Impact of OER: Achievements and Challenges. https://iite.unesco.org/publications/understanding-the-impact-of-oer-achievements-and-challenges/
Wiley, D. A. (2014). The access compromise and the 5th R. Iterating toward openness. http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3221
Wiley, D. A., Bliss, T. J., & McEwen, M. (2014). Open educational resources: A review of the literature. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition (pp. 781-789). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_63
Wiley, D. A., & Hilton, J. (2018). Defining OER-enabled pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19(4), 133-147. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3601
Yuan, M., & Recker, M. (2015). Not all rubrics are equal: A review of rubrics for evaluating the quality of open educational resources. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(5), 16-38. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2389
Zancanaro, A., Todesco, J. L., & Ramos, F. (2015). A bibliometric mapping of open educational resources. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1960
Zawacki-Richter, O., Conrad, D., Bozkurt, A., Aydin, C. H., Bedenlier, S., Jung, I., Stöter, J., Veletsianos, G., Blaschke, L. M., Bond, M., Broens, A., Bruhn, E., Dolch, C., Kalz, M., Kondakci, Y., Marin, V., Mayrberger, K., Müskens, W., Naidu, S., … Xiao, J. (2020). Elements of Open Education: An Invitation to Future Research. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3 SE-Notes from the Field). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4659

Citation

Otto, D., Schroeder, N., Diekmann, D., & Sander, P. (2021). Trends and Gaps in Empirical Research on Open Educational Resources (OER): A Systematic Mapping of the Literature from 2015 to 2019. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(4), ep325. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11145

Otto, D., Schroeder, N., Diekmann, D., and Sander, P. (2021). Trends and Gaps in Empirical Research on Open Educational Resources (OER): A Systematic Mapping of the Literature from 2015 to 2019. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(4), ep325. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11145

Otto D, Schroeder N, Diekmann D, Sander P. Trends and Gaps in Empirical Research on Open Educational Resources (OER): A Systematic Mapping of the Literature from 2015 to 2019. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2021;13(4), ep325. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11145

Otto, Daniel, Nadine Schroeder, Daniel Diekmann, and Pia Sander. "Trends and Gaps in Empirical Research on Open Educational Resources (OER): A Systematic Mapping of the Literature from 2015 to 2019". Contemporary Educational Technology 2021 13 no. 4 (2021): ep325. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11145

Otto, Daniel et al. "Trends and Gaps in Empirical Research on Open Educational Resources (OER): A Systematic Mapping of the Literature from 2015 to 2019". Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 13, no. 4, 2021, ep325. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11145

Otto D, Schroeder N, Diekmann D, Sander P. Trends and Gaps in Empirical Research on Open Educational Resources (OER): A Systematic Mapping of the Literature from 2015 to 2019. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2021;13(4):ep325. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11145