Trends and Priorities of Educational Technology Research: A Delphi Study

Xiaoman Wang; John Hampton; Albert D. Ritzhaupt; Kara Dawson

doi:10.30935/cedtech/12317

Xiaoman Wang ¹, John Hampton ², Albert D. Ritzhaupt ¹ ^* , Kara Dawson ¹

More Detail

CONT ED TECHNOLOGY, Volume 14, Issue 4, Article No: ep383

https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12317

Submitted: 13 May 2022, Published Online: 07 August 2022

OPEN ACCESS 1147 Views 957 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

As journal editors play an important role in defining and shaping academic discourse, knowing their opinions could likely prove beneficial for both current and future academic journal stakeholders. Within this vein, this study used the Delphi method to help build a profile on the trends and priorities within educational technology, from the unique perspective of the journals’ editors-in-chief. This expert panel—initially built from 117 national and international research journals—concluded with 25 editors-in-chief who finished all three rounds of the survey. Results indicated five emerging themes for trends and priorities: computer-focused, teaching and learning, online and digital education, societal, and research and theory. By exploring these current trends and priorities within educational technology, this study may provide meaningful insights to better understand the field as a whole and may also help scholars in their goal of publishing relevant, high-quality academic scholarship.

Keywords: educational technology research, trends, priorities, research journal editors, Delphi

References

Aharony, N., & Bronstein, J. (2013). A Delphi Investigation into the future of e-learning. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 911-914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.170
Arthur, C., Levett-Jones, T., & Kable, A. (2013). Quality indicators for the design and implementation of simulation experiences: A Delphi study. Nurse Education Today, 33(11), 1357-1361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.07.012
Birko, S., Dove, E. S., Ozdemir, V., & Dalal, K. (2015). Evaluation of nine consensus indices in Delphi foresight research and their dependency on Delphi survey characteristics: A simulation study and debate on Delphi design and interpretation. PLoS ONE, 10(8), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135162
Bodily, R., Leary, H., & West, R. (2019). Research trends in instructional design and technology journals: Research trends in instructional design and technology journals. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 64-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12712
Bond, M., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Nichols, M. (2019). Revisiting five decades of educational technology research: A content and authorship analysis of the British Journal of Educational Technology: Revisiting five decades of educational technology research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 12-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12730
Burbules, N. C., Fan, G., & Repp, P. (2020). Five trends of education and technology in a sustainable future. Geography and Sustainability, 1(2), 93-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.05.001
Cals, J. W., Mallen, C. D., Glynn, L. G., & Kotz, D. (2013). Should authors submit previous peer-review reports when submitting research papers? Views of general medical journal editors. The Annals of Family Medicine, 11(2), 179-181. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1448
Chen, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., & Xie, H. (2020). Detecting latent topics and trends in educational technologies over four decades using structural topic modeling: A retrospective of all volumes of Computers & Education. Computers & Education, 151, 103855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103855
Chim-Miki, A. F., & Batista-Canino, R. M. (2018). Development of a tourism coopetition model: A preliminary Delphi study. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 37, 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2018.10.004
Choppin, J., & Borys, Z. (2017). Trends in the design, development, and use of digital curriculum materials. ZDM, 49(5), 663-674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0860-x
Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the DELPHI method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458
Davies, B., & Felappi, G. (2017). Publish or perish. Metaphilosophy, 48(5), 745-761. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12269
Dawson, & Brucker, P. S. (2001). The utility of the Delphi method in MFT research. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 29(2), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926180126229
Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Scott, Foresman.
Dołowy-Rybińska, N. (2021). Publishing policy: Toward counterbalancing the inequalities in academia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2021(267-268), 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-0090
Ely, D. P. (1983). The definition of educational technology: An emerging stability. Educational Considerations, 10(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.4148/0146-9282.1793
Fyfe, A., Coate, K., Curry, S., Lawson, S., Moxham, N., & Røstvik, C. M. (2017). Untangling academic publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research. Discussion Paper. University of St Andrews. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.546100
Glenn, J. C., & Gordon, T. J. (2009). Futures research methodology—version 3.0 (CD-ROM). The Millennium Project, Washington, DC, USA. https://www.millennium-project.org/publications-2/futures-research-methodology-version-3-0/
Gordon, T. J. (1994). The Delphi method. Futures Research Methodology, 2(3), 1-30.
Green, B., Jones, M., Hughes, D., & Williams, A. (1999). Applying the Delphi technique in a study of GPs’ information requirements. Health & Social Care in the Community, 7(3), 198-205. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2524.1999.00176.x
Grindlay, D. J., Dean, R. S., Christopher, M. M., & Brennan, M. L. (2014). A survey of the awareness, knowledge, policies and views of veterinary journal editors-in-chief on reporting guidelines for publication of research. BMC Veterinary Research, 10(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-10
Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008-1015. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x
Heiko, A. V. D. G. (2012). Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: Review and implications for future quality assurance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(8), 1525-1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013
Helmer-Hirschberg, O. (1966). The use of the Delphi technique in problems of educational innovations. Rand. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P3499.html
Hlynka, D., & Jacobsen, M. (2010). What is educational technology, anyway? A commentary on the new AECT definition of the field. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La Revue Canadienne de l’apprentissage et de La Technologie, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.21432/T2N88P
Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 58-69. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005
Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2008). Educational technology: A definition with commentary. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203054000
Jubb, M. (2016). Peer review: The current landscape and future trends. Learned Publishing, 29(1), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1008
Kimmons, R. (2020). Current trends (and missing links) in educational technology research and practice. TechTrends, 64(6), 803-809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00549-6
Lasker, S. (2018). Peer review system: A golden standard for publications process. Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics, 9(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.3329/bioethics.v9i1.37104
Latchem. (2014). BJET editorial: Opening up the educational technology research agenda. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12122
Loo, R. (2002). The Delphi method: A powerful tool for strategic management. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 25(4), 762-769. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510210450677
Lopez-Catalan, B., & Bañuls, V. A. (2017). A Delphi-based approach for detecting key e-learning trends in postgraduate education: The Spanish case. Education+Training, 59(6), 590-604. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-12-2016-0186
Loughlin, K. G., & Moore, L. F. (1979). Using Delphi to achieve congruent objectives and activities in a pediatrics department. Journal of Medical Education, 54(2), 101-106. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-197902000-00006
Lounds, J., Oakar, M., Knecht, K., Moran, M., Gibney, M., & Pressley, M. (2002). Journal editors’ views on the criteria a paper must meet to be publishable. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(2), 338-347. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1092
Matias-Guiu, J. (2020). The role of scientific journal editors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Neurología (English Edition), 35(4), 223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrleng.2020.05.011
McGinty, S. (1999). Gatekeepers of knowledge: Journal editors in the sciences and the social sciences. Greenwood Publishing Group.
McGuigan, G., & Russell, R. (2008). The business of academic publishing: A strategic analysis of the academic journal publishing industry and its impact on the future of scholarly publishing. Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, 9(3). http://southernlibrarianship.icaap.org/content/v09n03/mcguigan_g01.html
Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Kereluik, K. (2009). The song remains the same: Looking back to the future of educational technology. TechTrends, 53(5), 48-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0325-3
Noble, K. A. (1989). Publish or perish: What 23 journal editors have to say. Studies in Higher Education, 14(1), 97-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075078912331377642
Pereira, V. (2017). Journal editors as philosopher kings: duties and responsibilities of academics in a changing world. South Asian History and Culture, 8(3), 360-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/19472498.2017.1350405
Pollard, C., & Pollard, R. (2004). Research priorities in educational technology: A Delphi study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(2), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2004.10782430
Raskin, M. S. (1994). The Delphi study in field instruction revisited: Expert consensus on issues and research priorities. Journal of Social Work Education, 30(1), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.1994.10672215
Ray, J. G. (2002). Judging the judges: The role of journal editors. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 95(12), 769-774. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/95.12.769
Rayens, M. K., & Hahn, E. J. (2000). Building consensus using the policy Delphi method. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 1(4), 308-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/152715440000100409
Reeves, T., & Oh, E. (2017). The goals and methods of educational technology research over a quarter century (1989-2014). Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(2), 325-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9474-1
Rice, K. (2009). Priorities in K-12 distance education: A Delphi study examining multiple perspectives on policy, practice, and research. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 163-177. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.12.3.163
Ritchie, D., & Earnest, J. (1999). The future of instructional design: Results of a Delphi study. Educational Technology, 39(1), 35-42. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44429010
Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), 353-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7
Rynes, S., & Gephart Jr, R. P. (2004). From the Editors: Qualitative Research and the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 454-462. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2004.14438580
Schimanski, L. A., & Alperin, J. P. (2018). The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future. F1000 Research, 7, 1605-1605. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16493.1
Skulmoski, G. J., Hartman, F. T., & Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 6(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.28945/199
Starfield, S., & Paltridge, B. (2019). Journal editors: Gatekeepers or custodians? Novice Writers and Scholarly Publication, 253-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95333-5_14
Turoff, M., & Linstone, H. A. (2002). The Delphi method-techniques and applications. https://web.njit.edu/~turoff/pubs/delphibook/index.html
Wellington, J., & Nixon, J. (2005). Shaping the field: The role of academic journal editors in the construction of education as a field of study. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(5), 643-655. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690500293835
Woolston, C. (2018). Why mental health matters. Nature (London), 557(7703), 129-131. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-04998-1
Xia, B., & Chan, A. P. (2012). Measuring complexity for building projects: A Delphi study. Engineering, Construction, and Architectural Management, 19(1), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981211192544
Zawacki-Richter, O. (2009). Research areas in distance education: A Delphi study. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.674

Citation

Wang, X., Hampton, J., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Dawson, K. (2022). Trends and Priorities of Educational Technology Research: A Delphi Study. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(4), ep383. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12317

Wang, X., Hampton, J., Ritzhaupt, A. D., and Dawson, K. (2022). Trends and Priorities of Educational Technology Research: A Delphi Study. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(4), ep383. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12317

Wang X, Hampton J, Ritzhaupt AD, Dawson K. Trends and Priorities of Educational Technology Research: A Delphi Study. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2022;14(4), ep383. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12317

Wang, Xiaoman, John Hampton, Albert D. Ritzhaupt, and Kara Dawson. "Trends and Priorities of Educational Technology Research: A Delphi Study". Contemporary Educational Technology 2022 14 no. 4 (2022): ep383. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12317

Wang, Xiaoman et al. "Trends and Priorities of Educational Technology Research: A Delphi Study". Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 14, no. 4, 2022, ep383. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12317

Wang X, Hampton J, Ritzhaupt AD, Dawson K. Trends and Priorities of Educational Technology Research: A Delphi Study. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2022;14(4):ep383. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12317