Implications of educational technology: A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited studies over twenty years

Oksana V. Vashetina; Tatyana Shoustikova; Natalia A. Zaitseva; Yelizaveta V. Chereshneva; Mariia S. Pavlova; Zhanna M. Sizova; Andrey V. Suslov

doi:10.30935/cedtech/19183

Oksana V. Vashetina ¹ ^* , Tatyana Shoustikova ², Natalia A. Zaitseva ³, Yelizaveta V. Chereshneva ⁴, Mariia S. Pavlova ⁴, Zhanna M. Sizova ⁴, Andrey V. Suslov ⁴ ⁵

More Detail

CONT ED TECHNOLOGY, Volume 18, Issue 4, Article No: ep684

https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/19183

Submitted: 28 January 2026, Published Online: 20 August 2026

OPEN ACCESS 57 Views 13 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

Educational technology (ET) plays an important role in improving student learning experiences, yet no prior study has systematically examined research trends among its most influential publications. This bibliometric study analyzed the 100 most-cited articles on ET published between 2005 and 2024, drawn from the Scopus database. Results show that articles published in 2020 received the highest total citations, with the USA, Taiwan, and Australia as the most productive countries and Computers and Education as the leading source journal. Analysis of the top 20 most-cited articles identified three themes: interactive learning environments, the role of digital technologies, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ET use. Keyword co-occurrence analysis further revealed four emerging research clusters spanning technology acceptance, learning-process monitoring, distance-learning pedagogy, and post-pandemic online/blended learning models. Co-citation analysis showed that researchers most frequently drew on studies addressing individual learner characteristics and technology acceptance frameworks (TAM/UTAUT). These findings offer researchers and practitioners a consolidated overview of the field’s most impactful contributions and emerging directions.

Keywords: educational technology, most cited studies, bibliometric analysis, 100 most cited, TAM, UTAUT

References

Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002
Ali, N. (2024). An investigation into the impact of educational technology on the teaching-learning process in higher education. International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology, 8(5), 142-149. https://doi.org/10.47001/irjiet/2024.805022
Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the e-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5261-5280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y
Balaji, D., & Sahija, D. (2022). Effectiveness of ICT in enhancing learning procedure in higher education. TTAICTE, 1(2), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.36647/ttaicte/01.02.a004
Bao, W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J., & Ciganek, A. P. (2011). Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843-855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.010
Chen, C. C., Wang, N. C., Tang, K. Y., & Tu, Y. F. (2022). Research issues of the top 100 cited articles on information literacy in higher education published from 2011 to 2020: A systematic review and co-citation network analysis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 34-52. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7695
Chen, H., Sun, D., Yang, Y., Looi, C., & Jia, F. (2023). Detecting and visualizing research trends of blended learning: A bibliometric analysis of studies from 2013-2022. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 19(10), Article em2336. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13592
Chen, V., Sandford, A., LaGrone, M., Charbonneau, K., Kong, J., & Ragavaloo, S. (2022). An exploration of instructors’ and students’ perspectives on remote delivery of courses during the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 512-533. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13205
Chen, X., Yu, G., Cheng, G., & Hao, T. (2019). Research topics, author profiles, and collaboration networks in the top-ranked journal on educational technology over the past 40 years: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Computers in Education, 6(4), 563-585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00149-1
Cheng, Y., Huang, C., & Hsu, L. C. (2021). Research trends in educational technology. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 18(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijthi.293191
Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2012). Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computers & Education, 63, 160-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.003
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211. https://doi.org/10.2307/249688
Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, P. A., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(1), 9-28. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7
Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. W. (2009). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x
Darmawansah, D. (2021). A Bibliometric Mapping of educational technology in Indonesia (2011-2020). Indonesian Scholars Scientific Summit Taiwan Proceeding, 3, 8-15. https://doi.org/10.52162/3.2021107
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
Domínguez, A., Saenz-De-Navarrete, J., De-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
Fu, F., Su, R., & Yu, S. (2008). EGameFlow: A scale to measure learners’ enjoyment of e-learning games. Computers & Education, 52(1), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.004
Görgülü, D. (2025). Higher education in Türkiye in the shadow of chaos: A study on students from the faculty of education in times of crisis. Educational Point, 2(1), Article e119. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/16452
Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2001). Educational research in the Internet age: Examining the role of individual characteristics. Educational Researcher, 30(9), 22-26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030009022
Hossein-Mohand, H., Hossein-Mohand, H., Albanese, V., & Del Carmen Olmos Gómez, M. (2025). AI in mathematics education: A bibliometric analysis of global trends and collaborations (2020-2024). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 21(2), Article em2576. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15915
Ishmuradova, I. I., Chistyakov, A. A., Chudnovskiy, A. D., Grib, E. V., Kondrashev, S. V., & Zhdanov, S. P. (2024). A cross-database bibliometrics analysis of blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(2), Article ep508. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14478
Jensen, L., & Konradsen, F. (2017). A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education and training. Education and Information Technologies, 23(4), 1515-1529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9676-0
Jiménez, C. R., Prieto, M. S., & García, S. A. (2019). Technology and higher education: A bibliometric analysis. Education Sciences, 9(3), Article 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030169
Kilavuz, F. (2024). Exploring research trends in the implementation of the flipped classroom model in educational research: A review of literature. Pedagogical Research, 9(3), Article em0216. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14730
Klašnja-Milićević, A., Vesin, B., Ivanović, M., & Budimac, Z. (2010). E-learning personalization based on hybrid recommendation strategy and learning style identification. Computers & Education, 56(3), 885-899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.001
Korsah, D. P., Wireko-Ampem, J. K., & Forson, I. (2026). Extending the UTAUT model with service quality to assess Moodle LMS acceptance in Ghanaian colleges of education. Interdisciplinary Educational Technology, 2(1), Article e107. https://doi.org/10.71176/interedtech/17900
Kuzu, Y., & Kuzu, O. (2022). Eğitsel oyunlar ie ilgili yapılan çalışmaların bibliyometrik bir analizi [A bibliometric analysis of studies on educational games]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(3), 724-740. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.1102403
Lai, C. L. (2020). Trends of mobile learning: A review of the top 100 highly cited papers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 721-742. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12884
Lee, B., Yoon, J., & Lee, I. (2009). Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1320-1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.014
Lee, M. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation-confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54(2), 506-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002
Liaw, S. (2007). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864-873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005
Liaw, S., Huang, H., & Chen, G. (2006). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1066-1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.001
Liesa-Orús, M., Latorre-Cosculluela, C., Vázquez-Toledo, S., & Sierra-Sánchez, V. (2020). The technological challenge facing higher education professors: Perceptions of ICT tools for developing 21^st century skills. Sustainability, 12(13), Article 5339. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135339
Mahdavinasab, Y., & Haseli, D. (2025). Conceptual structure and trend topics of the education and information technologies journal: A bibliometrics analysis. International Journal of Information Science and Management, 23(1), 211-230.
Masveta, D. (2026). Using EdTech to reach the unreached: Innovative approaches to non-formal education in Zimbabwe. Educational Point, 3(1), Article e162. https://doi.org/10.71176/edup/18866
Mena-Guacas, A. F., Rodríguez, J. A. U., Trujillo, D. M. S., Gómez-Galán, J., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Collaborative learning and skill development for educational growth of artificial intelligence: A systematic review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), Article ep428. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13123
Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, Article 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
Mohsen, M., Althebi, S., Bensalem, E., & Alsherif, N. (2025). A decade of highly cited articles in educational technology research: Emerging trends, dominant themes, and future directions. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 38, 310-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-025-09435-7
Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
Olszewski, B., & Crompton, H. (2020). Educational technology conditions to support the development of digital age skills. Computers & Education, 150, Article 103849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103849
Özel, M. (2024). An analysis of research trends on socio-scientific issues in science education over two decades from 2004 to 2023. Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 1(1), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.12973/jmste.1.1.69
Paechter, M., Maier, B., & Macher, D. (2010). Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education, 54(1), 222-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Park, J.-H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207-217.
Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, Article 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
Roca, J. C., Chiu, C., & Martínez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Selim, H. M. (2005). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education, 49(2), 396-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004
Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4
Sun, J. C., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
Sun, P., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
Sung, Y., Chang, K., & Liu, T. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
Venkatesh, N., Morris, N., Davis, N., & Davis, N. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Webster, J., & Hackley, P. (1997). Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1282-1309. https://doi.org/10.5465/257034
Wu, H., Lee, S. W., Chang, H., & Liang, J. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
Wu, J., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012

Citation

Vashetina, O. V., Shoustikova, T., Zaitseva, N. A., Chereshneva, Y. V., Pavlova, M. S., Sizova, Z. M., & Suslov, A. V. (2026). Implications of educational technology: A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited studies over twenty years. Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(4), Article ep684. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/19183

Vashetina, O. V., Shoustikova, T., Zaitseva, N. A., Chereshneva, Y. V., Pavlova, M. S., Sizova, Z. M., and Suslov, A. V. (2026). Implications of educational technology: A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited studies over twenty years. Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(4), ep684. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/19183

Vashetina OV, Shoustikova T, Zaitseva NA, et al. Implications of educational technology: A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited studies over twenty years. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2026;18(4), ep684. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/19183

Vashetina, Oksana V., Tatyana Shoustikova, Natalia A. Zaitseva, Yelizaveta V. Chereshneva, Mariia S. Pavlova, Zhanna M. Sizova, and Andrey V. Suslov. "Implications of educational technology: A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited studies over twenty years". Contemporary Educational Technology 2026 18 no. 4 (2026): ep684. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/19183

Vashetina, Oksana V. et al. "Implications of educational technology: A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited studies over twenty years". Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 18, no. 4, 2026, ep684. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/19183

Vashetina OV, Shoustikova T, Zaitseva NA, Chereshneva YV, Pavlova MS, Sizova ZM, et al. Implications of educational technology: A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most cited studies over twenty years. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2026;18(4):ep684. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/19183