Implementation of FCM Approach: Challenges Before Teachers and Identification of Gaps

Alaa Alahmadi; Mohammad Saleem

doi:10.30935/cedtech/12581

Alaa Alahmadi ¹, Mohammad Saleem ¹ ^*

More Detail

CONT ED TECHNOLOGY, Volume 14, Issue 4, Article No: ep394

https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12581

Submitted: 03 September 2022, Published Online: 26 October 2022

OPEN ACCESS 1078 Views 670 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

FCM is a new approach to lesson delivery in most of the developing world, and neither the (higher education) system, nor the teachers and learners are prepared and well-equipped to handle the demands of the approach. The present study was conducted to document the challenges before teachers implementing FCM in EFL/ESL classrooms. The study was conducted as an end-of-term survey using questionnaires and interview techniques for data collection. The questionnaire was comprised of statements on methods, materials, mode of delivery, and feedback to learners, while the semi-unstructured interviews were meant to gather a narrative account of teachers’ experiences in implementing FCM approach to language teaching. 50 university teachers from Saudi Arabia were surveyed for the study. The obtained results present a picture of difficulties before ESL teachers in implementing FCM. The majority of the participants (mean=49.8) opine that they face one or the other challenge when they use FCM approach in ESL classrooms. Roughly one third (mean=31.6) of the participants expressed that they do not face any challenges in implementing FCM. In the semi-structured interview sessions, the teachers expressed their dissatisfaction with the approach, and said they are generally ill-equipped to deliver lessons and address feedback issues effectively.

Keywords: flipped classroom, teaching challenges, survey study, learner achievement, in-class activities, out-of-class activities

References

Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale, and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
Akcayir, G., & Akcayir, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021
Alfaifi, A. A., & Saleem, M. (2022). Flipped classroom and psycholinguistic factors: An evaluation. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 28(1), 139-151. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2022-2801-10
Andujar, A., Salaberri-Ramiro, M. S., & Martínez, M. S. C. (2020). Integrating flipped foreign language learning through mobile devices: Technology acceptance and flipped learning experience. Sustainability, 12(3), 1110. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031110
Ansori, M., & Nafi, N. N. (2018). English teachers’ perceived benefits and challenges of flipped classroom implementation. Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies, 5(2), 211-227. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v5i2.820
Beetham, H., & White, D. (2013). Students’ expectations and experiences of the digital environment. Joint Information Systems Committee. https://repository.jisc.ac.uk/5572/1/JR0006_STUDENTS_EXPECTATIONS_EXEC_SUMMARY_v2.pdf
Cha, J., & Kim, H. B. (2016). Flipping organic chemistry course: Possibilities and challenges. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 36, 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/36/1/012013
Chen, G., Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classrooms: A synthesis of research in mathematics education. Educational Research Review, 22, 50-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.002
Chyr, W.-L., Shen, P.-D., Chiang, Y.-C., Lin, J.-B., & Tsai, C.-W. (2017). Exploring the effects of online academic help-seeking and flipped learning on improving students’ learning. Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 11-23.
Clark, R. M., Besterfield-Sacre, M., Budny, D., Bursic, K. M., Clark, W. W., Norman, B. A., Parker, R. S., Patzer, J. F., & Slaughter, W. S. (2016). Flipping engineering courses: A school wide initiative. Advances in Engineering Education, 5(3), 1-39.
Dahlstrom, E. (2012). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology. EDUCAUSE. http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/ecar-study-undergraduate-students-and-information-technology-2012
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. University Rochester Press.
Digital Pedagogy. (n. d.). Digital pedagogy–A guide for librarians, faculty, and students. University of Toronto Libraries. https://guides.library.utoronto.ca/c.php?g=448614&p=3552449
Gough, E., DeJong, D., Grundmeyer, T., & Baron, M. (2016). K-12 teacher perceptions regarding the flipped classroom model for teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 45(3), 390-423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516658444
Graziano, K. J. (2017). Peer teaching in a flipped teacher education classroom. TechTrends, 61(2), 121-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0077-9
Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012758
Ha, A. S., O’Reilly, J., Ng, J. Y. Y., & Zhang, J. H. (2019). Evaluating the flipped classroom approach in Asian higher education: Perspectives from students and teachers. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1638147. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1638147
He, W., Holton, A., Farkas, G., & Warschauer, M. (2016). The effects of flipped instruction on out-of-class study time, exam performance, and student perceptions. Learning and Instruction, 45, 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.07.001
Howitt, C., & Pegrum, M. (2015). Implementing a flipped classroom approach in postgraduate education: An unexpected journey into pedagogical redesign. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 458-469. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2439
Hsieh, C., Wu, W. C. V., & Marek, M. W. (2017). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1-2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1111910
Hsu, T.-C., (2018). Behavioral sequential analysis of using an instant response application to enhance peer interactions in a flipped classroom. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(1), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1283332
Jefferies, A. (2015). Are our students digitally ready for HE study? Exploring student attitudes to blended online study in a campus-based university. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(9), 1098-1106.
Johnston, B. M. (2017). Implementing a flipped classroom approach in a university numerical methods mathematics course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(4), 485-498. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1259516
Lee, J., Lim, C., & Kim, H. (2017). Development of an instructional design model for flipped learning in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, 427-453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9502-1
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2
Long, T., Cummins, J., & Waugh, M. (2016). Use of the flipped classroom instructional model in higher education: Instructors’ perspectives. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(2), 179-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9119-8
Loo, J. L., Eifler, D., Smith, E., Pendse, L., He, J., Sholinbeck, M., Tanasse, G., Nelson, J. K., & Dupuis, E. A. (2016). Flipped instruction for information literacy: Five instructional cases of academic librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(3), 273-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.03.001
McLaughlin, J. E., White, P. J., Khanova, J., & Yuriev, E. (2016). Flipped classroom implementation: A case report of two higher education institutions in the United States and Australia. Computers in the Schools, 33(1), 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2016.1137734
Nantha, C., Pimdee, P., & Sitthiworachart, J. (2022). A quasi-experimental evaluation of classes using traditional methods, problem-based learning, and flipped learning to enhance Thai student-teacher problem-solving skills and academic achievement. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(14), 20-38. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i14.30903
Rodriguez, J. E. (2016). A massively flipped class: Designing and implementing active learning information literacy instruction for a large enrolment course. Reference Services Review, 44(1), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-07-2015-0033
Sarker, M. F. H., Tamal, M. A., Khan, N. A., Islam, M. K., Akber, M. F., & Khan, S. (2022). Students’ experiences of e-learning practices during COVID-19: A qualitative study. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(14), 157-171. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i14.30393
Shnai, I. (2017). Systematic review of challenges and gaps in flipped classroom implementation: Toward future model enhancement. In Proceedings of the 16^thEuropean Conference on eLearning (pp. 484-490).
Tanner, M., & Scott, E. (2015). A flipped classroom approach to teaching systems analysis, design, and implementation. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 219-241. https://doi.org/10.28945/2266
Tomas, L., Evans, N. S., Doyle, T., & Skamp, K. (2019). Are first-year students ready for a flipped classroom? A case for a flipped learning continuum. International Journal of Educational Technology and Higher Education, 16, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0135-4
Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2015). Personalizing learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers & Education, 88, 354-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.008
Wilson, S. G. (2013). The flipped class: A method to address the challenges of an undergraduate statistics course. Teaching of Psychology, 40(3), 193-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628313487461

Citation

Alahmadi, A., & Saleem, M. (2022). Implementation of FCM Approach: Challenges Before Teachers and Identification of Gaps. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(4), ep394. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12581

Alahmadi, A., and Saleem, M. (2022). Implementation of FCM Approach: Challenges Before Teachers and Identification of Gaps. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(4), ep394. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12581

Alahmadi A, Saleem M. Implementation of FCM Approach: Challenges Before Teachers and Identification of Gaps. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2022;14(4), ep394. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12581

Alahmadi, Alaa, and Mohammad Saleem. "Implementation of FCM Approach: Challenges Before Teachers and Identification of Gaps". Contemporary Educational Technology 2022 14 no. 4 (2022): ep394. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12581

Alahmadi, Alaa et al. "Implementation of FCM Approach: Challenges Before Teachers and Identification of Gaps". Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 14, no. 4, 2022, ep394. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12581

Alahmadi A, Saleem M. Implementation of FCM Approach: Challenges Before Teachers and Identification of Gaps. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2022;14(4):ep394. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12581