Effectiveness of virtual reality in elementary school: A meta-analysis of controlled studies

Carlos A. Lara-Alvarez; Ezra Federico Parra-González; Miguel A. Ortiz-Esparza; Héctor Cardona-Reyes

doi:10.30935/cedtech/13569

Carlos A. Lara-Alvarez ¹, Ezra Federico Parra-González ¹, Miguel A. Ortiz-Esparza ¹, Héctor Cardona-Reyes ¹ ^*

More Detail

CONT ED TECHNOLOGY, Volume 15, Issue 4, Article No: ep459

https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13569

Submitted: 08 March 2023, Published Online: 11 August 2023

OPEN ACCESS 1053 Views 565 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

Virtual reality (VR) is rapidly gaining popularity and becoming more accessible. Numerous studies have examined the effectiveness of this technology in educational settings. This article provides a summary of the evidence regarding the efficacy of virtual environments for elementary education. A meta-analysis was conducted to combine the findings of independent experimental studies. The studies included in this review were sourced from reputable databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE, ACM, and ScienceDirect. The results indicate that students who learn in a virtual environment achieve higher learning scores compared to those in traditional classrooms (standard mean difference [SMD]=0.64, 95% CI [0.36, 0.92], p<0.001). Additionally, the findings suggest that learning in a tethered VR environment is equally effective as learning through mobile VR. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in scores when different media materials were used for the control group. This review emphasizes the advantages of employing mobile VR for learning in contrast to using tethered VR.

Keywords: virtual reality, elementary school, student learning outcome, academic achievement, tethered VR, mobile VR, VR platforms, immersive technology

References

Abich, J., Parker, J., Murphy, J. S., & Eudy, M. (2021). A review of the evidence for training effectiveness with virtual reality technology. Virtual Reality, 25(4), 919-933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00498-8
Akman, E., & Cakir, R. (2020). The effect of educational virtual reality game on primary school students’ achievement and engagement in mathematics. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1467-1484. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1841800
Amprasi, E., Vernadakis, N., Zetou, E., & Antoniou, P. (2022). Effect of a full immersive virtual reality intervention on selective attention in children. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 565-582. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15132a
Botden, S. M., Buzink, S. N., Schijven, M. P., & Jakimowicz, J. J. (2007). Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: What is the difference? World Journal of Surgery, 31(4), 764-772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0724-y
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Curcio, I. D., Dipace, A., & Norlund, A. (2016). Virtual realities and education. Research on Education and Media, 8(2), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1515/rem-2016-0019
Degli-Innocenti, E., Geronazzo, M., Vescovi, D., Nordahl, R., Serafin, S., Ludovico, L. A., & Avanzini, F. (2019). Mobile virtual reality for musical genre learning in primary education. Computers & Education, 139, 102-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.010
Demitriadou, E., Stavroulia, K.-E., & Lanitis, A. (2020). Comparative evaluation of virtual and augmented reality for teaching mathematics in primary education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 381-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09973-5
Fernandez, M. (2017). Augmented virtual reality: How to improve education systems. Higher Learning Research Communications, 7(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v7i1.373
Gwee, H. N. (2013). Effects of virtual-reality elements on spatial visualization skills of secondary three students in Singapore. In Y. Cai (Ed.), 3D immersive and interactive learning (pp. 45-57). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4021-90-6_3
Huang, K.-T., Ball, C., Francis, J., Ratan, R., Boumis, J., & Fordham, J. (2019). Augmented versus virtual reality in education: An exploratory study examining science knowledge retention when using augmented reality/virtual reality mobile applications. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(2), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0150
Huang, Y.-P., Zheng, X.-L., Chiu, C.-K., Lei, J., Yang, G., Kim, H., & Wang, F. (2021). Towards figurative expression enhancement: Effects of the SVVR-supported worked example approach on the descriptive writing of highly engaged students. Sustainability, 13(21), 12260. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13247
Hui, J., Zhou, Y., Oubibi, M., Di, W., Zhang, L., & Zhang, S. (2022). Research on art teaching practice supported by virtual reality (VR) technology in the primary schools. Sustainability, 14(3), 1246. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031246
Hwang, W.-Y., & Hu, S.-S. (2013). Analysis of peer learning behaviors using multiple representations in virtual reality and their impacts on geometry problem solving. Computers & Education, 62, 308-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.005
JASP Team. (2022). JASP software version 0.16.3. https://jasp-stats.org/
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
Liu, R., Wang, L., Koszalka, T. A., & Wan, K. (2022). Effects of immersive virtual reality classrooms on students’ academic achievement, motivation and cognitive load in science lessons. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1422-1433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12688
Luo, H., Li, G., Feng, Q., Yang, Y., & Zuo, M. (2021). Virtual reality in k-12 and higher education: A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2019. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(3), 887-901. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12538
Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in k-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033
Mikropoulos, T. A., & Natsis, A. (2011). Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999-2009). Computers & Education, 56(3), 769-780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.020
Nisha, B. (2019). The pedagogic value of learning design with virtual reality. Educational Psychology, 39(10), 1233-1254. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1661356
Nishikawa-Pacher, A. (2022). Research questions with PICO: A universal mnemonic. Publications, 10(3), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10030021
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery, 88, 105906. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Patera, M., Draper, S., & Naef, M. (2008). Exploring magic cottage: A virtual reality environment for stimulating children’s imaginative writing. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(3), 245-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820802114093
Prabakar, S., Porkumaran, K., Ramanan, S., & Cheranmadevi, K. (2021). Virtual reality a pragmatic technique for multi-sensory storytelling to improve the social communication of children with special needs. ICTACT Journal of Soft Computing, 11(2), 2245-2250.
Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Slater, M. (2005). From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(4), 332-339. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1651
Sun, Y., Chen, J., Wang, Z., Peng, M., & Mao, S. (2022). Enabling mobile virtual reality with open 5g, fog computing and reinforcement learning. IEEE Network, 36(6), 142-149. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.010.2100481
Villena-Taranilla, R., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., González-Calero, J. A., & López Cirugeda, I. (2022a). Strolling through a city of the Roman Empire: An analysis of the potential of virtual reality to teach history in primary education. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(4), 608-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674886
Villena-Taranilla, R., Tirado-Olivares, S., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., & González-Calero, J. A. (2022b). Effects of virtual reality on learning outcomes in K-6 education: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 35, 100434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100434

Citation

Lara-Alvarez, C. A., Parra-González, E. F., Ortiz-Esparza, M. A., & Cardona-Reyes, H. (2023). Effectiveness of virtual reality in elementary school: A meta-analysis of controlled studies. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep459. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13569

Lara-Alvarez, C. A., Parra-González, E. F., Ortiz-Esparza, M. A., and Cardona-Reyes, H. (2023). Effectiveness of virtual reality in elementary school: A meta-analysis of controlled studies. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep459. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13569

Lara-Alvarez CA, Parra-González EF, Ortiz-Esparza MA, Cardona-Reyes H. Effectiveness of virtual reality in elementary school: A meta-analysis of controlled studies. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2023;15(4), ep459. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13569

Lara-Alvarez, Carlos A., Ezra Federico Parra-González, Miguel A. Ortiz-Esparza, and Héctor Cardona-Reyes. "Effectiveness of virtual reality in elementary school: A meta-analysis of controlled studies". Contemporary Educational Technology 2023 15 no. 4 (2023): ep459. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13569

Lara-Alvarez, Carlos A. et al. "Effectiveness of virtual reality in elementary school: A meta-analysis of controlled studies". Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 15, no. 4, 2023, ep459. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13569

Lara-Alvarez CA, Parra-González EF, Ortiz-Esparza MA, Cardona-Reyes H. Effectiveness of virtual reality in elementary school: A meta-analysis of controlled studies. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2023;15(4):ep459. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13569