A Comparison of Perceived Stress Levels and Coping Styles of Non-traditional Graduate Students in Distance Learning Versus On-campus programs

Jose A. Ramos

doi:10.30935/cedtech/6059

Jose A. Ramos ¹ ^*

More Detail

CONT ED TECHNOLOGY, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp. 282-293

https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6059

OPEN ACCESS 2050 Views 5363 Downloads

Download Full Text (PDF)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the differences in perceived stress and coping styles among non-traditional graduate students in both on-campus and distance-learning programs. The study employed a quantitative causal-comparative design that involved collecting survey data. The sample consisted of 36 non-traditional graduate students who enrolled in distance learning classes along with 36 non-traditional students attending traditional on-campus courses in a graduate program. For statistical analyses, t-test and multiple linear regressions were conducted to simultaneously assess the effects of group membership and all demographic variables on each of the dependent variables (stress level and coping style). An alpha level of .05 was used to test statistical significance. Overall, there is no significant difference between the coping styles and the perceived stress levels of non-traditional graduate students who enrolled in distance-learning and on-campus programs.

Keywords: Distance learning, Non-traditional students, Stress, Coping styles, Graduate education, On-campus programs

References

Cohen, S. (1986). Contrasting the Hassles Scale and the Perceived Stress Scale: Who is
really measuring appraised stress? American Psychologist, 41, 716-718.
Cohen S., Kamarck, T., Mermelstein, R. (1983). A Global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385-396.
Donavant, B. (2009). The new, modern practice of adult education. Adult Education Quarterly, 59(3), 227–245.
Dzurilla, T. J. & Sheedy, C. F. (1992). The relationship between social problem solving ability and subsequent level of academic competence in college students. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16(5), 589-599.
Finney, J. & Moos, R. (1995). Entering treatment for alcohol abuse: A stress and coping
model. Addiction, 90, 1223-1240.
Folkman, S. & Lazarus, R. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process- study of emotion and coping during 3 stages of a college-examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 150-170.
Gulgoz, S. (2001). Stresses and strategies for international students succeeding in graduate school: The career guide for psychology students. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Karoly, L. A. (2007, February). Forces shaping the future U.S. workforce and workplace: Implications for 21st century work (Testimony No. CT-273).
Kitahara, R. & Westfall, F. Promoting academic integrity in online distance learning courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(3).
Koopman, C., Gore-Felton, C., Marouf, F., Butler, L. D., Field, N., Gill, M., Chen, X., Israelski, D.,
& Spiegel, D. (2000). Relationship of perceived stress to coping, attachment and social
support among HIV-positive persons. AIDS Care, 12(5), 663-672.
Moos, R. H. (2003). Coping responses inventory adult form: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources. Odessa, FL.
Noh, S. & Kaspar, V. (2003). Perceived discrimination and depression: Moderating effects of coping, acculturation, and ethnic support. American Journal of Public Health, 93(2), 232- 238.
Pusser, B., & Breneman, D. (2007). Returning to learning: Adults' success in college is key to America's future, 1–26. Lumina Foundation for Education.
Rahman, A., Situ, J., & Jimmo, V. (2005, October). Participation in postsecondary education: Evidence from the Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics (Research Paper No. 81-595- MIE— No. 036). Retrieved from Culture, Tourism and the Centre for Education Statistics, Statistics Canada, Ottawa website: http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca/Collection/ Statcan/81-595-MIE/81-595-MIE2005036.pdf
Romano, J. L. (1992). Psychoeducational interventions for stress management and well-being. Journal of Counseling and Development, 71(2), 199-202.
Snyder, P. & Tate, P. (2010). The Catalyst. Back to school. The Council for Adult and Experiential Learning, 4(2).
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). Digest of Education Statistics, 2008 (NCES 2009-020).

Citation

Ramos, J. A. (2011). A Comparison of Perceived Stress Levels and Coping Styles of Non-traditional Graduate Students in Distance Learning Versus On-campus programs. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(4), 282-293. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6059

Ramos, J. A. (2011). A Comparison of Perceived Stress Levels and Coping Styles of Non-traditional Graduate Students in Distance Learning Versus On-campus programs. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2(4), pp. 282-293. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6059

Ramos JA. A Comparison of Perceived Stress Levels and Coping Styles of Non-traditional Graduate Students in Distance Learning Versus On-campus programs. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2011;2(4), 282-293. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6059

Ramos, Jose A.. "A Comparison of Perceived Stress Levels and Coping Styles of Non-traditional Graduate Students in Distance Learning Versus On-campus programs". Contemporary Educational Technology 2011 2 no. 4 (2011): 282-293. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6059

Ramos, Jose A. "A Comparison of Perceived Stress Levels and Coping Styles of Non-traditional Graduate Students in Distance Learning Versus On-campus programs". Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 2, no. 4, 2011, pp. 282-293. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6059

Ramos JA. A Comparison of Perceived Stress Levels and Coping Styles of Non-traditional Graduate Students in Distance Learning Versus On-campus programs. CONT ED TECHNOLOGY. 2011;2(4):282-93. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6059